75-100 Assignment: Business Case Analysis | Rubric for Assessment

TOTAL: /5 NAME: POOR – 1 AVERAGE – 2 GOOD – 3 EXCELLENT – 4
Problem Identification

Comments:

Mark: /2 Demonstrates superficial understanding of the case, confusing symptoms and issue(s) with little opportunity for solution. Distinctions between root cause and symptoms is unclear, demonstrating an understanding of the case, but with limited depth. Clearly distinguishes problem from symptoms and actionable issue(s), articulated adequately but would benefit from further thought. Root cause of core problem is identified and described with clarity and concision.
Issue or Situational Analysis

Comments:

Mark: /2 Facts are repeated without scrutiny or analysis. No meaningful analysis is offered. Linkages among strategic implications are not well identified. At least one relevant tool for internal and external analysis is appropriately utilized. Strategic implications are identified in reasonable depth. At least one relevant tool for internal and external analysis is well utilized. Strategic implications are identified in excellent depth and are integrated. Multiple relevant tools are well applied, both internally and externally.
Actionable Recommendation for Problem Resolution

Comments:

Mark: /1 Recommendations suggest simple solutions that are vague, unrealistic, and/or unrelated to the core problem. Recommendations are adequate but need attention regarding integration, level of support, realism, and/or full connection with the core problem. Recommendations are limited, but actionable, well integrated, and responsive to the core problem. The recommendation is effective, efficient, and feasible to the extent articulated. Recommendations are a complete, integrated “vision” for the organization that is directly responsive to the identified problem and provides effective, efficient, feasible, and well integrated action items.

75-100 Assignment: Business Case Analysis | Rubric for Assessment

TOTAL: /5 NAME:
POOR – 1 SATISFACTORY – 2 GOOD – 3 EXCELLENT – 4
Problem Identification

Comments:

Mark: /2 Demonstrates superficial understanding of the case, confusing symptoms and issue(s) with little opportunity for solution. Distinctions between root cause and symptoms is unclear, demonstrating an understanding of the case, but with limited depth. Clearly distinguishes problem from symptoms and actionable issue(s), articulated adequately but would benefit from further thought. Root cause of core problem is identified and described with clarity and concision.
Issue or Situational Analysis

Comments:

Mark: /2 Facts are repeated without scrutiny or analysis. No meaningful analysis is offered. Linkages among strategic implications are not well identified. At least one relevant tool for internal and external analysis is appropriately utilized. Strategic implications are identified in reasonable depth. At least one relevant tool for internal and external analysis is well utilized. Strategic implications are identified in excellent depth and are integrated. Multiple relevant tools are well applied, both internally and externally.
Actionable Recommendation for Problem Resolution

Comments:

Mark: /1 Recommendations suggest simple solutions that are vague, unrealistic, and/or unrelated to the core problem. Recommendations are adequate but need attention regarding integration, level of support, realism, and/or full connection with the core problem. Recommendations are limited, but actionable, well integrated, and responsive to the core problem. The recommendation is effective, efficient, and feasible to the extent articulated. Recommendations are a complete, integrated “vision” for the organization that is directly responsive to the identified problem and provides effective, efficient, feasible, and well integrated action items.

Order from us and get better grades. We are the service you have been looking for.