Business IT and Supply Chain
Length: Your assignment should be in the range of 2,000 – 2,200 words. If a number of words is out the word limit, the proposal will be marked as if written within the word limit. The mark awarded will then be reduced by 10% per 200 words. References are not considered in the word count.
The objective of this assignment is to develop a sound understanding on how the latest information technologies maintain its contributions in e-supply chain coordination. In particular, this report focuses on measuring performance and development issues of technology in e-supply chain coordination in a highly competitive business environment.
You are required to research on one of the latest information technologies available for e-supply chain management. Examples must be given to illustrate your points and support your arguments.
Please choose from one of the following latest technologies.
- IoT (Internet of Things)/IIoT (Industrial Internet of Things)
- AR (Augmented Reality)
- Predictive Analytics/Prescriptive Analytics
- Fleet Management Software/Solution
- Cognitive Computing
- RTLS (Real Time Locating/Location System)
- 3D Printer
- Drone
- Driverless/Autonomous Vehicle
- Smart Phone Apps
- Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence
- Social Media (i.e. streamline SC)
The focus of the research should not be entirely on the technology or the design itself (It is not about “WHAT”). You have to include an in-depth analysis and discussion HOW & WHY appropriate use of the technology can enhance e-supply chain coordination, especially in a highly competitive business environment. You have to demonstrate a strong link between the technology in the e-supply chain coordination and how can a company/businesses use it to compete in this environment.
Apart from the covering page, the report should include the following:
- Title Page
- Executive Summary/abstract
- Table of Contents (Add/Insert Table of Contents to The Document Using Word Tool)
- Introduction or Background
- Discussion (Analysis)
- Conclusion
- Appendices
- References
Assessment Criteria
- In-Depth Knowledge and understanding of the information technology in e-supply chain coordination.
- Good discussion and analysis of the contributions – especially in a highly competitive business environment.
- Good analysis/discussion of “how” and “why” instead of “what”.
- Clarity of presentation
- Adequate up-to-date references (within 6 years 2010-2017/2018) from the Internet and the literature to support arguments.
- Correct referencing style (Harvard referencing system) used
- You must include at least 8 Journal Articles/cases/business report (as References)
Assignment 1
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIntroduction
– Clearly define the needs for IT for e-supply chain coordination.
|
10.0 to >8.0 Pts
EXCEPTIONAL — 1) Introduction establishes context and engages the reader in a way that demands to be read. 2) The objective/direction of the report is clearly stated and well presented.
|
8.0 to >6.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS — 1) Introduction is well defined well structured. 2) Order and structure are present, but could be made a little clearer or better presented.
|
6.0 to >4.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS APPROPRIATELY— 1) Introduction is presented but the content is not well presented. 2) The direction in this assignment is not well explained.
|
4.0 to >2.0 Pts
MARGINALLY DEMONSTRATED — 1) Introduction fails to set context or engage reader. 2) Choice of areas included in the introduction is irrelevant.
|
2.0 to >0 Pts
NOT DEMONSTRATED — 1) Little attempts to explain/define the purpose of writing this assignment.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDiscussion on “How”
Outline how the IT has benefited the business in their e-supply chain coordination
|
20.0 to >16.0 Pts
EXCEPTIONAL — 1) Clearly identifies and insightfully analyses how IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination. 2) Demonstrates exceptional knowledge an understanding in addressing how.
|
16.0 to >12.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS — 1) Clearly identifies how IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination and analyses them adequately.
|
12.0 to >8.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS APPROPRIATELY — 1) Demonstrates understanding between how and why IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination. However, the connections on how and why to improve eSC coordination are not in-depth enough.
|
8.0 to >4.0 Pts
MARGINALLY DEMONSTRATED — 1) The questions about how are identified and analysed, but lack of in-depth explanation. 2) Some evidence does not support the point or inappropriate.
|
4.0 to >0 Pts
NOT DEMONSTRATED — 1) Does not clearly identify or analyse the main outlines (How). 2) No evidence of how IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination provided.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDiscussion on “Why”
Outline why the IT has benefited the business in their e-supply chain coordination
|
20.0 to >16.0 Pts
EXCEPTIONAL — 1) Clearly identifies and insightfully analyses why IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination. 2) Demonstrates exceptional knowledge an understanding in addressing why.
|
16.0 to >12.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS — 1) Clearly identifies why IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination and analyses them adequately. 2) Demonstrates good understanding and knowledge in the questions why.
|
12.0 to >8.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS APPROPRIATELY — 1) Demonstrates understanding between why and how IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination. However, the connections on why and how to improve eSC coordination are not in-depth enough.
|
8.0 to >4.0 Pts
MARGINALLY DEMONSTRATED — 1) The questions about why are identified and analysed, but lack of in-depth explanation. 2) Little research is apparent and weak evidence of the questions “why” provided .
|
4.0 to >0 Pts
NOT DEMONSTRATED — 1) Does not clearly identify or analyse the main outlines (Why). 2) No evidence of why IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination provided.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDiscussion on ‘how’ to compete.
How can a company/businesses use IT in eSC coordination to compete in this environment
|
20.0 to >16.0 Pts
EXCEPTIONAL — 1) Clearly identifies the IT in use eSC coordination, embedded or implicit aspects of the roles.
|
16.0 to >12.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS — 1) Demonstrates good understanding of how can a company use IT in eSC coordination to compete in this environment.
|
12.0 to >8.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS APPROPRIATELY — 1) With brief discussions how can a company use IT in eSC coordination to compete in this environment? 2) The writer may include information that is not directly relevant to the objective.
|
8.0 to >4.0 Pts
MARGINALLY DEMONSTRATED — 1) Does not offer adequate discussion about how and why IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination and to compete in a competitive environment.
|
4.0 to >0 Pts
NOT DEMONSTRATED – 1) Does not demonstrate connection on how and why IT has benefited businesses in eSC coordination. 2) Exploration of issue is superficial or trivial.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIn-depth research.
In-depth research conducted in the selected topic
|
15.0 to >12.0 Pts
EXCEPTIONAL — Exceptional research conducted beyond in the assigned tasks.
|
12.0 to >9.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS — 1) Substantial research conducted to prove an in-depth understanding and discussion in the selected topic.
|
9.0 to >6.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS APPROPRIATELY — 1) Adequate research conducted to understand the selected topic and to address the objectives in the assignment.
|
6.0 to >3.0 Pts
MARGINALLY DEMONSTRATED — 1) Minimum research conducted but still inadequate to address the selected topic.
|
3.0 to >0 Pts
NOT DEMONSTRATED — 1) Little or no research conducted in the selected topic.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeConclusion
|
10.0 to >8.0 Pts
EXCEPTIONAL — 1) Conclusion is insightful and conclusive. 2) Insightful plan to leverage topic, concise and drawing well from the discussion and evidence.
|
8.0 to >6.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS — 1) Conclusion is appropriate. Rich insights and impactful and drawing well from the discussion and evidence.
|
6.0 to >4.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS APPROPRIATELY — 1) Reflective conclusion, highlight key aspects of the topic.
|
4.0 to >2.0 Pts
MARGINALLY DEMONSTRATED — 1) Poor summarising and generic or somewhat irrelevant conclusions. Stating basics rather than highlighting insights.
|
2.0 to >0 Pts
NOT DEMONSTRATED — 1) Little or no reflection on impacts of the case. 2)Unclear conclusions or not relevant to the topic.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReferencing & Formats
Demonstration of proper citing and referencing in Harvard style, appropriate formats in the report
|
5.0 to >4.0 Pts
EXCEPTIONAL — 1) Excellent referencing style, in-text citation and report format.
|
4.0 to >3.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS — 1) In-text citation or referencing style needs to be improved.
|
3.0 to >2.0 Pts
MET REQUIREMENTS APPROPRIATELY — 1) In-text citation and referencing style needs to be improved
|
2.0 to >1.0 Pts
MARGINALLY DEMONSTRATED — 1) In-text citation or referencing style needs to be improved. report format is incorrect.
|
1.0 to >0 Pts
NOT DEMONSTRATED — 1) Incorrect in-text citation, referencing style and formats.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
Total points: 100.0
|
Order from us and get better grades. We are the service you have been looking for.