Business Ethics And Sustainability-Civil Engineering homework paper
Sheet1
BUSN20134 Business Ethics and Sustainability- Reflection Assignment 2 Part B .2 – Assessment Rubric (This information is provided as a guide to expectations regarding the reflective assignment. As with any assessment tasks students should seek further clarification from the facilitator and unit coordinator to insure they understand the requirements of the assessment task)
Weighting Fail-III Fail-II Fail-I Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction
Diagnostic Tools & Cases 30% 3 or fewer ethical diagnostic tools used and or referred to- Incomplete results sheets attached as appendices. No evidence of the nominated case. 3 or fewer ethical diagnostic tools used and or referred to- Incomplete results sheets attached as appendices. 1-2 cases attached but not verified or not the nominated cases. 3 or fewer ethical diagnostic tools used and or referred to- Incomplete results sheets attached as appendices 3 ethical diagnostic tools referred to and evidenced 2 nominated and verified cases attached. 3-5 ethical diagnostic tools referred to and evidenced the 2 nominated and verified cases attached and at least 2 others referred to. 6-10 ethical diagnostic tools referred to and evidenced the 2 nominated with the 2 verified cases attached and at least 3 others referred to. 11-15 ethical diagnostic tools referred to and evidenced the 2 nominated with the 2 verified cases attached and at least 5 others referred to
Reflective Essay , Analysis and Learning Assessment. Discussion of key events linked to ethical practice, directly linked to diagnostic results and to the nominated case. 50% No evidence of self-development in the essay. Very poorly developed and limited evidence of self-reflection in the essay or links to diagnostic results or clear plans for development Limited self-reflection and vague links to diagnostic tools. Lack of clear examples from professional practice as basis for arguments for reflective practice. Little clear discussion of learning activities Satisfactory reflection using 2-3 critical incidents and general reference to the ethical diagnostic tools and cases. Some attempt to use ethical theories to analyse the cases and decision making. Good reflection referring to the ethical diagnostic tools and cases diagnostic results, and using 4-5 examples from professional ethical practice as basis for reflection. Links to the specific cases and ethical theories as a way of engaging in self analysis. Some reference to the value of the unit content. Very good reflection, specific reference to the ethical tools diagnostic tools contrasting results and using more than 5 examples as the basis for reflective practice. Specific use of the cases and decision making and using a range of ethical theories as the basis for analysing the decision and drawing conclusion about future practice. Clear discussion of the value of the unit and how the material will be applied in future. Superior reflection based on multiple, concise examples from professional practice. Contrasting result of multiple relevant ethical tools and specific ethical theories to analyse decision making from the nominated cases and other cases, specific use ethical theories to analyse decision making and directly contrast against tools. Inference drawn about applicability as a future manager and concise overview of learning.
Report Presentation Layout, structure and readability of the written reflection 20% Very poorly presented reflection essay. Attachments incomplete. Poorly presented reflection essay.- very little effort spent on structure, and general presentation. Attachments incomplete. Poor reflection essay, limited evidence cohesive and integrated structure Attachments incomplete or use of non-verified cases. Satisfactory reflection essay. presentation – clear and readable layout, appropriate use of headings. Minimum standard of required attachments Clear, attractive and readable reflection, good layout and structure. Required attachments. Very good reflective essay, well presented, good layout and structure. Good use of headings and clear expression and grammar. Required attachments Superior reflective essay, well presented, good layout and structure. Excellent use of headings and clear expression and grammar. Clear and concise language content flow. Required attachments .
