Applying Cultural Capabilities /Human Resource Management

HD (85-100)

D (75-84)

C (65-74)

Pass (50-64)

Fail (0-49)

(50%)

The report includes :

· concise, clear introduction, all components included

· concise, clear and relevant summary of video clip and detailed observations

· in-depth, substantial, clear and relevant discussion of issues in the analysis

· the analysis is comprehensively supported by academic sources

· examples from the chosen video clip are extremely well selected and thoroughly integrated into the analysis

· Highly appropriate recommendations; clearly related to the analysis

· clear, summative conclusion

50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43

The report includes:

· clear introduction, all components included

· clear and relevant summary of scenario and observations

· thoughtful, clear and relevant discussion of issues in the analysis

· the analysis is well supported by academic sources

· examples from the chosen video clip are well selected and integrated into the analysis

· appropriate recommendations; related to the analysis

· clear conclusion

42 41 40 39 38

The report includes

· mostly clear introduction, most components included

· mostly clear and relevant summary of scenario and some observations

· mostly clear, relevant, and well-supported outline of issues in the analysis

· the analysis is quite well supported by academic sources

· examples from the chosen video clip are integrated into the analysis.

· appropriate recommendations; could be better related to the analysis

· mostly clear conclusion

37 36 35 34 33

· The report includes most of the required sections, but some of these are not adequately completed or supported

· The report seems fragmented, or difficult to understand the relationships between each section.

· Academic sources are only occasionally integrated in the report.

· There may be some irrelevant information.

· The analysis needs to be developed

· Recommendations could be more appropriate and related to the scenario.

· Conclusion is poorly related to items in the report

32 31 30 29 28 27 26

· Some required sections of the report are missing, not completed, or not appropriately supported

· It is unclear how the sections of the report relate to each other

· There is almost no reference to academic sources.

· Reference list is missing

· There is little or no analysis of the video and safe spaces

· There may be some irrelevant information.

· No or irrelevant recommendations are made

· No conclusion included

25 21 17 13 9 5 0

(20%)

· Content logically and cohesively developed through the summary and observations, analysis, and recommendation sections.

· Content type highly appropriate for each section.

· No unnecessary repetition.

20 19 18 17

· Content logically developed through the summary and observations, analysis, and recommendation sections.

· Content type appropriate for each section.

· Very little unnecessary repetition.

16 15

· The organisation is logical. However some areas need further development.

· Content type mostly appropriate for each section.

· There is some unnecessary repetition

14 13

· Organisation is generally clear but lacks cohesion which makes the ideas difficult to follow.

· Content type is sometimes inappropriate for each section

· Considerable unnecessary repetition between sections.

12 10

· There is little cohesion between different sections.

· Content type is often inappropriate for each section.

· Unnecessary repetition of ideas is frequent.

9 7 5 3

(10%)

10 9.5 9 8.5

8 7.5

7 6.5

6 5

4 3 2

(5%)

· Student name, student number and page numbers in footer.

· Title of assessment in header.

· Assignment file name saved with correct labelling format as per the assignment instructions

5 4.5

· Student name, student number, title of assessments and page numbers are in header and/or footer.

· Name, unit, assign number details in the assignment file name.

4

· Student and assessment identification and page numbers are in headers and footers, but identification not complete.

· Some identification included in file name but not all components.

3.5

· Student identification and title of assessment are partly in headers and footers but much information missing.

· File not submitted in the requested format (.doc) for marking.

· Identification missing in file name.

3 2.5

· Significant number of formatting errors.

· Student identification and title of assessment are not in headers and footers.

2 1

(15%)

· In-text citation used accurately according to the APA Style Guide.

· The report consistently and accurately uses APA 6th referencing style for video and images.

· Contents of the reference list accurately reflect the sources used in the report.

· Reference list formatted accurately according to the APA Style Guide.

15 14 13

· In-text citation mostly used accurately according to the APA Style Guide. One or two errors are present.

· There is mostly accurate use of APA 6th referencing style for video and images.

· Contents of the reference list mostly reflect the sources used in the report.

· Reference list mostly formatted accurately according to the APA Style Guide. One or two errors present.

12.5 12 11.5

· An attempt has been made to use in-text citation according to the APA Style Guide. Some errors are present.

· Use of APA 6th referencing style for video and images has been attempted. However some errors present.

· Contents of the reference list reflect the sources used in the report, but some discrepancies are present.

· Reference list partly formatted according to the APA Style Guide, but some errors present.

11 10.5 10