Question:
This is a graduate level course HA533 Managerial Epidemiology. The topic of the paper is Cancer Epidemiology. Below is the grading rubric. Please make sure all work is cited in APA style and no plagiarism because my last paper was full of plagiarism. Thank you This assignment is intended to help students become fully acquainted with the major public health and/or health care concerns in the United States and/or the world and objectives created to address these concerns. This is to be a scholarly paper written in APA format. Briefly, the paper should be no more than 10 – 15 double-spaced typed pages that are clear, concise, direct, and well referenced. Your title page, abstract page and reference pages will not be included in the page count. Please remember that this is an epidemiology course and you will be expected to apply epidemiologic principles that you learn in this course. This is to be a scholarly paper written in APA formatIf you have any questions about proper APA format that cannot be easily answered with your APA manual, you might want to visit the website www.apastyle.org (Links to an external site.). Briefly, the paper should be no more than 10 – 15 double-spaced typed pages that are clear, concise, direct, and well referenced. Your title page, abstract page and reference pages will not be included in the page count. The paper must be submitted in Times New Roman 12 with 1 inch margins. The Term Paper is worth 50 points. Accuracy of Information 10-9 Points: Information is accurate.10.0 pts 8-7 Points: Information is generally accurate.8.0 pts 6-5 Points: Accuracy of information is in question.6.0 pts 4-0 Points: Information is inaccurate.4.0 pts 10.0 pts Format (APA) 10-9 Points: Documentation according to the American Psychological Association is correct (www.apastyle.org).10.0 pts 8-7 Points: Documentation according to the American Psychological Association is correct (www.apastyle.org).8.0 pts 6-5 Points: Documentation is generally correct, containing a few minor errors (www.apastyle.org).6.0 pts 4-0 Points: Documentation contains several errors (www.apastyle.org).4.0 pts 10.0 pts Grammar, Clarity, Punctuation, Spelling 10-9 Points: The paper is well organized. Paragraphs are unified, coherent, and well developed. Sentences are syntactically superior, demonstrating an awareness of stylistic variations and sophistication. Transitions are smooth, precise, logical, and appropriate. Diction is not only precise and idiomatic, but is also fresh, original, engaging, and thought provoking.10.0 pts 8-7 Points: The organization of the paper is clear and controlled. Paragraphs are unified and coherent, though perhaps slightly underdeveloped. Transitions are effective, but some may be weak or mechanical. Sentences are well constructed, demonstrating some awareness of stylistic variations and sophistication. Diction is precise, idiomatic, and occasionally advanced in its range. Mechanically, the essay contains some errors in usage, punctuation, and/or spelling, but it contains few (if any) errors that obscure communication or weaken clarity.8.0 pts 6-5 Points: Mechanically, the paper is generally correct, though it may contain errors in usage, punctuation, and/or spelling. Diction is generally idiomatic and clear, though occasionally imprecise. Sentences are generally lacking in variety and/or conciseness, demonstrating little awareness of stylistic options. Transitions are clear but perhaps mechanical or monotonous. Paragraphs are unified and coherent, though occasionally underdeveloped. Diction is inappropriate and vague, often obscuring clear communication.6.0 pts 4-0 Points: The organization of the paper is inconsistent, illogical or chaotic. Paragraphs are incoherent and/or underdeveloped. Transitions are ineffective, unclear or nonexistent. Sentences are seriously flawed, incoherent, incomplete, or monotonous, demonstrating a very limited range of stylistic options. Diction is inappropriate and vague, often obscuring clear communication.4.0 pts 10.0 pts Logical 10-9 Points: Reasoning is persuasive and valid and demonstrates an awareness of the complexities of the subject.10.0 pts 8-7 Points: Reasoning is valid and consistent.8.0 pts 6-5 Points: The reasoning is valid, though perhaps containing a minor flaw in logic.6.0 pts 4-0 Points: Reasoning is flawed. The central idea is confusing, contradictory, and/or unclear. Support for the central idea is underdeveloped, irrelevant, and redundant or absent.4.0 pts 10.0 pts References (Used Appropriate Resources) 10-9 Points: Appropriate references were selected.10.0 pts 8-7 Points: Appropriate references were selected.8.0 pts 6-5 Points: The majority of references are appropriate and current.6.0 pts 4-0 Points: The majority of references are not current and/or are inappropriate related to the topic.4.0 pts 10.0 pts Total Points: 50.0
