Compare and contrast the two cases, providing analysis and critical evaluations of each |law
Read the following two cases:
Case 1:Â Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (1976)
Case 2:Â Â Harrison v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., 176 F 3d 776 (1999)
Compare and contrast the two cases, providing analyses and critical evaluations of each with reference to the other regarding:
The type of fraud at issue
The legal theories discussed
The result of the case
Note that what is required is not a summary of the cases. Instead, offer an informed discussion of your thoughts on fraud liability and the rules for fraud liability, based on the specifics of what you have learned in Module 4. Consider the different scenarios for fraud liability, including those based on an individual, a business, or an employee committing fraud on behalf of an unknowing business.
Finally, address the remedies available in such fraud actions. How do remedies in fraud actions attempt to address fairness, and how are they successful—or not successful—in this respect? In answering these questions, research an additional case that supports your position.
Your paper should be 3-5 pages in length and should follow the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. The paper should include citation and discussion of an additional case to support your proposed remedy.
Project does not have any attached files
