Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Communication, Financial Impact to Corporation
Order Description
The paper must include a critical analysis of the relationship among different work (articles). The journals must be scholarly, peer reviewed journal used to build the “review of literature
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
What is a review of literature? – i l . 1
Generally, the purpose of a review is to analyze critically a segment of a published body of l
knowledge through summary, classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of 5
literature, and theoretical‘alticles. i
Writing the introduction: In the introduction, you ‘should:
1. Define or identify the general to pic, issue, or area of concern, thus providing an appropriate
context for reviewing the literature.
2. Point out overall trends in what has been published about the topic; or conflicts in theory,
methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship; or a single problem I
or new perspective of immediate interest.
3. Establish the writer’s reason (point of View) for reviewing the literature; explain the criteria to be
used in analyzing and comparing literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, I
when necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included (scope). ’ g
1!.
Writing the body: In the body, you should:
V 1. Group research studies and other types of literature (reviews, theoretical articles, case studies,
etc.) according to common denominators such as qualitative versus quantitative approaches,
conclusions of authors, specific purpose or objective, chronology, etc.
i ‘ 2. Summarize individual studies or peer-reviewed articles with as much or as little detail as each
2, merits according to its comparative importance in the literature, remembering that Space (length)
denotes significance.
3. Provide the reader with strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts”
throughout, and brief “so what” summary sentences at intermediate points in the review to aid in is
understanding comparisons and analyses.
Writing the conclusion: In the conclusion, you should: ‘ I
1. Summarize major contributions of significant studies and peep-reviewed articles to the body
of knowledge under review, maintaining the focus established in the introduction.
2. Evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major I
methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or
issues pertinent to future study.
3. Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the
literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or
profession.
i3
J Fed-5/23/2015 i
