Critical thinking on employment discrimination-law

Critical thinking on employment discrimination-law

order instructions:
Please read carefully chapter 27. After you learned about employment discrimination. In disparate treatment cases, the plaintiff must show that the defendant intentionally discriminated but not in disparate impact cases. Is it fair to hold employers liable when there is a lack of evidence of intentional wrongdoing? Why do you think this is the court’s policy?
Note:
1) Be sure to include your own thoughts and insights and not just an explanation of how the law works.
2) Try and come up with specific examples that explain how you have arrived at your conclusion.
3) Realize that just because a policy is law does not mean that it is the only way to do things. Suggest a better law/policy if that is what you think should be done.

Order from us and get better grades. We are the service you have been looking for.