Discuss the leadership theories of the two (2) selected leaders| Article writing
Paper 2: A Public Leader
Due Week 6 and worth 200 points
Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question (except Question 5) under the following section headings:
· Public Leader Overview (Question 1)
· Public Leader Comparison and Contrast (Question 2)
· Public Leader Evaluation & Analysis (Question 3)
· Public Leader Influence (Question 4)
· Conclusion
Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:
1. Based on your response to Question 3 in Assignment 1, use the Internet to research two (2) renowned public leaders—one (1) male and one (1) female—that embody your selected theory(ies) and styles. Develop a brief overview (i.e., no more than one [1] paragraph for each leader) of the selected leaders and the leadership theory that defines each as a public administrator.
2. Compare and contrast the leadership theories of the two (2) selected leaders in Question #1. (Consider some of the following: theories that make him / her effective as a leader; whether or not his / her gender impacts his or her ability to lead; supervisors’ and subordinates’ view of him / her as a leader.)
3. Determine three (3) leadership style strengths and three (3) leadership style weaknesses of each of the selected public leaders. Evaluate the effectiveness of each public leader in terms of each leader’s major successes.
4. Suggest one (1) key strength or weakness that could influence your ability to be a public leader.
5. Include at least four (4) peer-reviewed references (no more than five [5] years old) from material outside the textbook. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental Websites. Wikipedia, other wikis, and any other Websites ending in anything other than “.gov” do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
· Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Differentiate among the styles of public leadership.
· Determine the role of public leadership in influencing the operations of public organizations and decisions of public administrators.
· Examine the personal aspects of public leadership and professional ethics.
· Assess how to motivate, communicate, implement change, and resolve conflicts as an effective public leader.
· Analyze the concepts of leadership and the qualities, skills, and practices necessary for effective public leadership.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues in public leadership and conflict resolution.
· Write clearly and concisely about issues in public leadership and conflict resolution using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills. Click here to access the rubric for this assignment.
Points: 200
Assignment 2: A Public Leader
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Develop a brief overview (i.e., no more than one [1] paragraph for each leader) of the selected leaders and the leadership theory that defines each as a public administrator.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely developed a brief overview (i.e., no more than one [1] paragraph for each leader) of the selected leaders and the leadership theory that defines each as a public administrator.
Partially developed a brief overview (i.e., no more than one [1] paragraph for each leader) of the selected leaders and the leadership theory that defines each as a public administrator.
Satisfactorily developed a brief overview (i.e., no more than one [1] paragraph for each leader) of the selected leaders and the leadership theory that defines each as a public administrator.
Thoroughly developed a brief overview (i.e., no more than one [1] paragraph for each leader) of the selected leaders and the leadership theory that defines each as a public administrator.
2. Compare and contrast the leadership theories of the two (2) selected leaders in Question #1. (Consider some of the following: theories that make him / her effective as a leader; whether or not his / her gender impacts his or her ability to lead; supervisors’ and subordinates’ view of him / her as a leader.) Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the leadership theories of the two (2) selected leaders.
Partially compared and contrasted the leadership theories of the two (2) selected leaders.
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the leadership theories of the two (2) selected leaders.
Thoroughly compared and contrasted the leadership theories of the two (2) selected leaders.
3. Determine three (3) leadership style strengths and three (3) leadership style weaknesses of each of the selected public leaders. Evaluate the effectiveness of each public leader in terms of each leader’s major successes.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely determined three (3) leadership style strengths and three (3) leadership style weaknesses of each of the selected public leaders. Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the effectiveness of each public leader in terms of each leader’s major successes.
Partially determined three (3) leadership style strengths and three (3) leadership style weaknesses of each of the selected public leaders. Partially evaluated the effectiveness of each public leader in terms of each leader’s major successes.
Satisfactorily determined three (3) leadership style strengths and three (3) leadership style weaknesses of each of the selected public leaders. Satisfactorily evaluated the effectiveness of each public leader in terms of each leader’s major successes.
Thoroughly determined three (3) leadership style strengths and three (3) leadership style weaknesses of each of the selected public leaders. Thoroughly evaluated the effectiveness of each public leader in terms of each leader’s major successes.
4. Suggest one (1) key strength or weakness that could influence your ability to be a public leader.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) key strength or weakness that could influence your ability to be a public leader.
Partially suggested one (1) key strength or weakness that could influence your ability to be a public leader.
Satisfactorily suggested one (1) key strength or weakness that could influence your ability to be a public leader.
Thoroughly suggested one (1) key strength or weakness that could influence your ability to be a public leader.
5. 4 references
Weight: 5%
Does not meet the required number of references.
Meets the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references good quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
7. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section
Weight: 5%
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
8. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
9. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
