Explain how the relative ease of prosecuting Lavasseur compared and contrasted with the difficulty of intervention in Sarkissian.
. Fully explain how the relative ease of prosecuting Lavasseur compared and contrasted with the difficulty of intervention in Sarkissian. How did these two cases also illustrate the very different environment in which U.S. law enforcement found itself with the terrorism threat?
2. First, identify at least ten separate factors that characterize terrorists according to the “Understanding Terrorists” section of the McCormack textbook. Secondly, in your own words,
explain how your familiarization with each of the ten factors helps you to better understand how to exploit terrorist organizations.
3. First, provide the specific details of the Panama and Mexico abduction for trial cases discussed in McCormack. Secondly, provide your own specific reasoning for agreeing or disagreeing with such abductions. Third, explain why you would agree or disagree with such abductions from the U.S. if conducted by other countries.
4. In no less than 250 words, compare and contrast the emphasis in most criminal investigations with the emphasis in most terrorism-related investigations. You may also include other legitimate differences and similarities.
5. Identify the constitutional issue raised in material support prosecutions related to the right of association, vagueness, and overbreadth of the statutes, and due process regarding the methods for designation of foreign terrorist organizations.
