Grad Level Proxy Statement and Analysis

Locate the latest proxy statement for one of the three companies listed below (see “Notes” for guidance in locating proxy statement):

  • Apple, Inc. 2. Dollar Tree 3. Ford Motor Company

For the company you select, you will analyze the company’s executive compensation program. Specific factors to be considered are presented below. Refer to materials in Chapter 12 of the text for clarification of compensation terms and to SEC Regulation S-K, Item 402 – Executive Compensation, for disclosure requirements https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000119312517003753/d257185ddef14a.htm#toc257185_1 . Address the following questions:

  • What are the objectives of the company’s executive compensation program? Do they appear to support the business strategy of the company? If so, how? Demonstrate the linkage. Would you make any changes to the company’s executive compensation objectives or philosophy? If so, what would you change? Why?
  • How is the CEO’s performance assessed? Based on what you have learned about performance appraisal in this course, are the factors/measures used to assess CEO performance appropriate? Are the factors used to assess the performance of the CEO adequately described? Why or why not?
  • What is the CEO’s total compensation for the most recent year? Does this level of compensation appear to be warranted? Why or why not? Support your response with appropriate arguments, references, or comparisons.
  • What percentage of the CEO’s compensation is “at risk” (performance-based)? Does the amount of pay at risk change your view of whether executive pay is too high? Why of why not?
  • Most professionals rely on comparisons of executive pay with Total Shareholder Return (TSR) as an indicator of “fairness” in executive pay. What is your opinion of TSR as the measure for assessing CEO performance? What alternatives exist? Support your response with appropriate references.Â
  • The SEC has adopted a final rule implementing the provision of the Dodd-Frank Act that requires U.S. public companies to disclose the ratio of their CEO’s compensation to that of their median employee. This rule will go into effect the first time a company files a proxy statement after January 1, 2017. Do you believe that this “Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule” will be beneficial in controlling executive compensation? Why or why not? Support your response with appropriate arguments and references.
  • Dodd-Frank also requires periodic “Say on Pay” votes by shareholders. Do you believe this rule is beneficial in controlling executive compensation? Why or why not?Â
  • What is your major take-away from this assignment? What did you learn that you did not know about executive compensation prior to this assignment?

The proxy analysis should be prepared as a research paper following APA guidelines. Do not merely answer the questions. The analysis must have a title page followed by an abstract and text with major section headings addressing each of the issues identified above. For example, the first section heading after the Abstract might be titled “Executive Compensation Philosophy.” This heading should be followed by a narrative discussion and evaluation of the executive compensation objectives or compensation philosophy of the company. Be sure to address the questions posed above in your narrative response in each section. The paper should be limited to a maximum of 8 pages, excluding the title page and references.

Notes:

  • SEC Regulation S-K, Item 402 is summarized in a website sponsored by the School of Law, Cornell University (www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/229.402).Â
  • A Proxy Statement can frequently be located on the company’s corporate website. It can also be located at www.sec.gov. Enter the EDGAR database, enter the name of the company, and locate the latest version of Form DEF 14A. This will be the Proxy Statement.

APA Formnat, minimum 5 References. Do not just answer the questions, this is a research paper and the questions should be answered within the paper itself. Ensure you are blunt with answers and show how you came up with the answer.

Â

RUBIX for Grading:

Â

MSHRM Written (HRMWritten)

MSHRM Written (HRMWritten)

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates content knowledge, understanding, and application gained from readings, videos, and other coursework or outside research
3.0 ptsExceeds Expectations 2.0 ptsMeets Expectations 1.0 ptsBelow Expectations
3.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDisplays effective layout and organization of materialNew Row2
0.0 ptsExceeds Expectations 0.0 ptsMeets Expectations 0.0 ptsBelow Expectations
0.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDisplays correct spelling, tense, punctuation, and grammar usage
0.0 ptsExceeds Expectations 0.0 ptsMeets Expectations 0.0 ptsBelow Expectations
0.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUses a professional vocabulary appropriate to a business audience
0.0 ptsExceeds Expectations 0.0 ptsMeets Expectations 0.0 ptsBelow Expectations
0.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdheres to requirements regarding format, due date, length, spacing, title page, references, or other stated requirements
0.0 ptsExceeds Expectations 0.0 ptsMeets Expectations 0.0 ptsBelow Expectations
0.0pts
Total Points: 15.0
Order from us and get better grades. We are the service you have been looking for.