Human rights/Critically discuss the definition and development of the three generations of human rights and discuss their limitations and implications for social
work/welfare practice.(1,000 words) Discuss the meaning of a human rights-based approach to social work (or welfare) practice.
two parts: Critically discuss the definition and development of the three generations of human rights and discuss their limitations and implications for social
work/welfare practice.(1,000 words) Discuss the meaning of a human rights-based approach to social work (or welfare) practice. (1,000 words) able to demonstrate a
critical understanding of a range of human rights theories; able to demonstrate a critical understanding of a range of human rights practice principles in an
international context be able to explain and apply human rights principles to social work practice. Marking criteria The essay will be marked on clarity, content,
grammatical correctness and presentation. I will be looking for a well argued and well constructed essay. Be sure to reference the work of others, and to structure
your essay with an introduction, body and conclusion. Do not use headings – I will expect the structure to be self-evident through your use of logical argument and
expression. Please note that on-line journals and other authoritative references are quite acceptable, so long as they are refereed/peer-reviewed sites. On-line
encyclopaedia references are not acceptable. 10 sources is expected in your reference list. References should only appear in your reference list if they have been used
in the body of the essay. The marking rubric below provides you with a guide on how your assignment is graded. Criteria 0-49% Unsatisfactory performance FL 50-64% An
adequate answer PS 65-74% An above average answer CR 75-84% An excellent answer DI 85–100% An exceptional answer HD Clarity of structure, written expression and
presentation and correct citation and referencing Frequent spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors . Evidence of plagiarism Inadequate citation & referencing
Little apparent structure. Some imprecise statements requiring elaboration and/or clarity of ideas expressed. Few spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors
Development of citation & referencing approach. Evidence of structure. Very little sign of imprecise statements Consistent approach to citation & referencing with few
errors. Logical structure. Writing provides evidence of knowledge, enthusiasm and control. Consistent approach to citation & referencing. Logical & consistent
structure Writing provides strong evidence of knowledge, enthusiasm and control Sustained evidence of correct citation and referencing Skillfully crafted, logical
structure. Evidence of relevant reading within and beyond the material provided Insufficient evidence of reading. Limited reading beyond the subject materials.
Evidence of some reading appropriate to the topic and beyond the subject material. Clear evidence of wide reading beyond core subject matter Evidence of
independently and comprehensively sourced wide reading beyond core subject matter. Evidence of understanding human rights and social work Reproduction of
material from readings with little or no interpretation or narrative. Limited understanding and application of ideas concepts and principles and some basic
interpretation of theory. Evidence of application of ideas, concepts and principles and some interpretation of theory within human rights and social work theories.
Consistent application of ideas, concepts and principles and interpretation of theory in human rights and social work theories. Comprehensive application of ideas,
concepts and principles and critical interpretation oh human rights and social work theories. Clarity in understanding of the origin of human rights and application to
social work Little or no evidence of understanding how human rights originated and how they apply to social work. Some evidence of understanding how human rights
originated and how they apply to social work. Evidence of a satisfactory level of critical commentary including explicit articulation of principles and concepts.
Clear evidence of critical commentary including justification of principles and concepts used. Comprehensive evidence of critical commentary drawing on clearly
justified principles and concepts informing original or innovative arguments. Sound reflection and innovation in approaching human rights and social work Poor
reflection that justifies arguments presented. statements and reflections supported by some arguments or references and largely demonstrate sound judgment.
statements and reflections supported by by clear arguments or references and demonstrate sound judgement. Coherent arguments and references presented and some
evidence of innovation or creativity. Comprehensive and well informed arguments and substantial innovation or creativity evident and reflect considered refection and
wide reading and research.
