LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PLAN INSTRUCTIONS
Working with a group, you will present one collaborative plan incorporating a new leadership theory (developed by the group) for effective leadership and management within a sport organization. The group can pick any organization in which they choose to implement their new leadership theory.
The groups will complete a 25–30 PowerPoint slide presentation with at least 15 distinct references using APA format. By Module/Week 1, the instructor will divide the class into groups (4 students per group). Each group will be responsible for developing the PowerPoint presentation due Module/Week 7.
Each group member will be required to evaluate the other group members. Grades will be based on the project as a whole, as well as based on the evaluations received by other group members in regards to their cooperation and involvement within the project.
The Leadership Development Plan is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 7.
LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRADING RUBRIC
Criteria Levels of Achievement Points
Earned
Proficient Competent Novice
Quality ofInformation 46 to 50 points
Information clearly relates to the main topic and is accurate. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. 41 to 45 points
Information clearly relates to the main topic, with only one inaccurate piece of information. No details and/or examples are given. 0 to 40 points
Information has little or no relation to the main topic or is confusing. Accuracy of the information is questionable.
Organization 46 to 50 points
Information is very organized and ordered in a logical fashion. 41 to 45 points
Information is organized, with minor disruptions in the flow of the presentation. 0 to 40 points
Information is disorganized with no clear plan or flow.
Content 73 to 80 points
All topics are thoroughly addressed and/or all questions are answered. 65 to 72 points
All or most topics are generally, but not comprehensively addressed and all or most questions were answered. 0 to 64 points
Topics and/or questions were not addressed satisfactorily.
Cooperation 73 to 80 points
Group shares tasks and student significantly contributed to the project. 65 to 72 points
Group shares most tasks and student adequately contributed to the project. 0 to 64 points
Group tasks are unevenly shared. Student does not adequately contribute to the project.
Sources 37 to 40 points
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format. 33 to 36 points
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but some are not in the desired format. 0 to 32 points
Sources are not accurately documented or formatted.
Presentation 73 to 80 points
Presentation is clean and well thought out. Overall power, insight, and impact of the project are well represented. 65 to 72 points
Presentation is clean and displays some forethought. Overall power, insight, and impact of the project are adequately displayed. 0 to 64 points
Presentation is disorganized and shows little sign of planning. Power, insight, and impact of the project are lacking.
Mechanics 27 to 30 points
2 or less current APA formatting, grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. 23 to 26 points
3–5 current APA formatting, grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. 0 to 22 points
More than 5 current APA formatting, grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.
Instructor’s Comments:
