It must be done in Chicago style
I attached the case I showed the books that needed to be used
I explained what the professor wants
They have to analyze the case and the judges decision in the case and the appeal using the the theories and
concepts in those 2 books I cited
They need to form an opinion on whether the judge came to the right conclusion based upon those theories my
argument is that he did not
They need to use the theories but not just give definitions of the stuff I put in the comments everything is there
in the original order information and in my comments
Follow the file: Order__99658_REVISE.doc
Description
A. Analyze the Garrison decisions using:
1. Sunstein and Burton principles.
Required books for analysis:
(Burton, An Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning, (Boston: Little Brown and Company, (Latest Edition);
(Sunstein, Legal Reasoning and Political Conflcit, (New York: Oxford University Press, (Latest Edition).
2. Puzzle methodology that we have learned in class and elsewhere. (I will provide some information about this)
B. Answer the questions (in addition to your analysis).
1. Did the judge in the Garrison case come to a correct conclusion?
2. Regardless of your assertion in answer to question 1B, reason to the opposite conclusion.
