Operational, Analytical and Strategic CRM: do they exist?|Management
To achieve this, you must include at least 15 references from appropriate journals and reference these accordingly.
Submission Date and Hand in Requirements: 12 January 2018 through Turnitin ONLY.
There are mark penalties for late submissions. (Corruption of computer disks is not an adequate excuse for late hand in, as work should be adequately backed up.)
Word Count: The word count should not exceed 1700 words (excluding references) but you may add to that additional information in the form of appendices and tables. Words that exceed the permitted word count will not read beyond the stated word count. A falsely stated word-count is an assessment offence.
Referencing requirements: All sources should be acknowledged and appropriately cited within your work, following the University’s approved referencing conventions. [APA 6th ed]
Formatting: Font size should be point 12 using an ‘easy to read’ font, for example Calibri or Arial. Line spacing must be set at 1.5 with 4 cm margins all round. The Header must include your student number and the Footer must include a page number.
Marking and Feedback: Marking will be carried out in accordance with the marking criteria grid below and the University of Portsmouth grading criteria for UG level 5. Marks and feedback will be available through Turnitin, or by email, by 6th February 2017.
Marking Criteria Grid
Failure < 40%
40 – 59%
60– 69%
First >70%
Introduction and background to topic
Limited introduction not focused on aims of assignment
Topic well focused but introduction and context incomplete
Introduction clearly expressed; context well defined
As for good pass
Understanding of key issues
Minimal understanding of key issues
Main issues largely identified, but some lack of focus
All issues clearly understood, with some differentiation in terms of importance
Issues clearly understood and differentiated in terms of importance
Evidence of reading and/or choice of appropriate concepts
Little evidence of reading or limited /inappropriate use of module material; unclear theoretical framework; important work uncited or key concepts ignored
Evidence of reading or appropriate use of module material but with some gaps. Literature /concepts adequately but not critically reviewed.
Good critical literature review or well-justified choice of module material. Theoretical framework supports study.
Demonstrates high level of scholarship.
Analysis
Largely descriptive; practically no analysis of central issues. Qualitative or quantitative data analysis inaccurate.
Some critical analysis of central issues, but with some inaccuracies.
Relevant and full analysis
Comprehensive and critical analysis of central issues.
Presentation and evaluation of evidence
Some evidence to support arguments but uncritical acceptance of material; poor or incomplete citation; unjustified conclusions.
Appropriate evidence, generally assessed critically; weak interpretation of qualitative aspects; some gaps in linkages between evidence and conclusions.
Full, critical assessment of discriminatingly selected material; some evidence of independent thought
Full, critical assessment of discriminatingly selected material; evidence of independent thought; substantial individual insights evident
Marking Criteria
Failure < 40%
40 – 59%
60– 69%
First >70%
Presentation:
Structure, clarity, use of grammar, correct spelling
Poor: lack of structure and clarity; grammatical mistakes; inadequate referencing
Reasonably clear presentation; reasonable referencing; few grammatical or spelling mistakes
Demonstrates very good communication skills; accurate referencing; very few/no grammatical or spelling errors
Excellent communication skills; accurate referencing; virtually no errors; scholarly, well-organised treatment of material
Attainment of learning objectives
Attainment of few/none of the relevant learning objectives
Attainment of a good majority of the relevant learning objectives
Attainment of substantial majority of the relevant learning objectives
Attainment of nearly all of the
