This assignment consists of two (2) parts: a project schedule, and a written response. You must submit both parts as separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the part of the assignment it is written for.
Part A: Project Schedule
(Submit as one [1] Microsoft Project file)
Part B: Written Response
(Submit as a Microsoft Word file)
Write a one to two (1-2) page response in which you:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 150 | Assignment 4: Project Schedule | ||||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
Part A: Project Schedule | |||||
1a. Using the information from your project proposal, create a multi-level work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule which addresses the stated criteria.
Weight: 55% |
Did not submit or incompletelycreated a multi-level work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule which addresses the stated criteria. | Insufficientlycreated a multi-level work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule which addresses the stated criteria. | Partiallycreated a multi-level work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule which addresses the stated criteria. | Satisfactorilycreated a multi-level work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule which addresses the stated criteria. | Thoroughlycreated a multi-level work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule which addresses the stated criteria. |
Part B: Written Response | |||||
1b. Analyze your project in terms of project completion, critical path, and slack / float.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletelyanalyzed your project in terms of project completion, critical path, and slack / float. | Insufficientlyanalyzed your project in terms of project completion, critical path, and slack / float. | Partiallyanalyzed your project in terms of project completion, critical path, and slack / float. | Satisfactorilyanalyzed your project in terms of project completion, critical path, and slack / float. | Thoroughlyanalyzed your project in terms of project completion, critical path, and slack / float. |
2b. Summarize the recommendations or improvements you would make to your project schedule.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletelysummarized the recommend-ations or improvements you would make to your project schedule. | Insufficiently summarized the recommend-ations or improvements you would make to your project schedule. | Partially summarized the recommend-ations or improvements you would make to your project schedule. | Satisfactorily summarized the recommend-ations or improvements you would make to your project schedule. | Thoroughly summarized the recommend-ations or improvements you would make to your project schedule. |
3b. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting.
Weight: 5% |
More than 8 errors present | 7-8 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |
Class,
SafeAssign is a new plagiarism detection tool used by Strayer University faculty to check submitted assignments for plagiarism. When students upload an assignment to the Blackboard course shell the assignments submitted will automatically be submitted to SafeAssign to check for plagiarism. Once submitted, you will be given a percentage of the paper (in a Safe Assign Originality Report) that matches other sources. That percentage must be 25% or below to have an acceptable submission. (That would mean that 25% or less of the paper was copied/pasted from another site.) Any parts of your paper that have been directly quoted (part of that 25%) must be properly cited and referenced in APA format.