Stealing and Ethics Integrating Sources Short Answer Paper e

Stealing and Ethics Integrating Sources Short Answer Paper e

 

Supporting your ethical decisions adds credibility to your views. Articulating the connection between your choices and credible sources will add weight to your input
and decision-making.
Demonstrate how you integrate support into your work this week. Explain clearly, using a formal tone, how 2 pieces of support reinforce your answer. When complete,
this assignment should consist of at least 3 paragraphs, with 2 pieces of support integrated into each paragraph, and a reference page.
• Answer each question below with a minimum of one paragraph each (3-4 sentences).
• Choose 2 pieces of support from the week’s material related to each question’s answer.
• Summarize your chosen support. Do not use quotations!
• Integrate the support into the paragraph. An example is provided below.
• In each answer, clearly explain how the summaries support your answers to the questions below. An example is provided below.
• Cite the support using APA guidelines.
• Provide a reference page.

Questions:
1. Is stealing always unethical? You may not choose a neutral stance.
2. Would Immanuel Kant agree or disagree with your stance?
3. How do emotion and reason influence your response?

Example:
Inclusion of the tribe in the basic research methods is crucial. Tiered consent has been shown to be the most successful method for obtaining consent for long-term
specimen research among collectivist cultures (Holmes, 2006), and using this method would involve the tribe directly with the process, encouraging engagement of the
tribal elders, who in the past, have been resistant to research involving specimen storage of any kind. According to Mendelson (2009), collectivist cultures such as
the Havasupai become more engaged if deeply involved in the decision-making process, and may add input that can help direct research methods. Including the tribal
elders in the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the plan for storage and disposal of specimens will help to honor tribal customs and encourage trust between
researchers and tribal members.
(Holmes and Mendelson would be referenced on a separate reference page.)

Criterion Above Average (5 points) 4 Points Average (3 points) 2 Points Below Average (0-1 points) Weight
Intro/Thesis First paragraph clearly identifies the topic, thesis, approximate structure of the paper and previews main points. Does not meet above average
standards, but exceeds average. First or second paragraph identifies the topic, thesis, and approximate structure of the paper. Does not meet average standards, but
exceeds below average. Paper does not identify the paper’s topic, or thesis, or structure of paper.
15%
Organization Paper follows plan from intro and is clear and easy to follow; meets or exceeds length requirements Paper follows a somewhat coherent plan,
has a somewhat coherent structure, and is somewhat difficult to follow. Paper does not follow a coherent plan, lacks structure, or is NOT THE PROPER LENGTH.
10%
Mechanics:
Clarity
Tone
Grammar
Contains no unclear sentences
Is readable, engaging, scholarly
Has no grammatical mistakes
No more than 1 minor ambiguity per page
Has a scholarly but dry tone
No more than 1 minor grammatical error per page
More than 1 ambiguity per page
Non-scholarly tone
More than 1 grammatical error per page 10%
Support/APA format Clearly identifies textual support with a minimum of 2 citations. Follows APA format structure with title and reference page.
No more than 1 serious failure to identify textual support properly; less than 2 citations; improper citations or references; minor APA formatting
issues Does not contain textual support. Does not follow APA citation guidelines; does not follow APA guidelines for formatting 15%
Analysis/Originality Clearly states which arguments are stronger and why; makes clear connection between thesis and support; thorough support of thesis;
originality percentage is within guidelines Incomplete or unclear explanations of which arguments are stronger and why; unclear connection between support
and thesis; insufficient support of thesis; originality percentage exceeds limit No attempt to explain which arguments are stronger or why; no
connection between support and thesis; off topic; originality percentage exceeds limit-paper cannot be graded as student’s work 35%
Conclusion Last paragraph clearly states the thesis and gives a brief summary; complete and logical end to paper Summarizes the paper content and
provides closure to the paper or restates thesis No summary of content; no thesis; abrupt end to the paper 15%

Order from us and get better grades. We are the service you have been looking for.