Objectives:
In this assignment cycle, we will extend the lessons on argumentation to consider strong evidence. It will be of particular interest to examine evidence in the context of beliefs and values, where often people believe without much supporting evidence. In terms of structure, we will continue to target matters of organization, and will delve more deeply into the psychological origins of theories of good paragraphs, and will consider what makes for great introductions and conclusions.
Required Reading (on Blackboard):
Premise:
In the last assignment, we considered the morality of persuasion. When is it right to use coercive pressure on another person or group? In the process, we began to encounter questions about ethics, or what is right or ought to be done as a necessary component of such decisions.
In this assignment, we will consider questions about what ought to be done more directly. If, according to Aristotle, the greatest end we seek is happiness, how should we live in order to achieve it? What values will send us on the right path? Should we focus on the pleasures of the moment, for example, or act with careful regard to principles in the hope of more lasting rewards? Knowing that there are moral principles we can choose to follow, can we still be happy if we choose to ignore them, or if we mistakenly choose the wrong principles to live by? These questions will necessarily take us through questions of philosophical, psychological, and religious discussions of happiness, and you’re invited to narrow your consideration based on your own preferred approach.
Having read the assigned chapter, and consulted scholarly work related to your topic, please respond to the following prompt in an essay of approximately 5 double-spaced pages:
Can the immoral person be happy?
Further questions:
Tentative schedule (refer to Blackboard for the most up-to-date information on assignments):
Feb. 24: WP-2 due. Introduce WP-3. Assign groups for presentations.
HW: Read the assigned source for your group, prepare notes/ideas for in-class presentation with your group on 3/3.
Feb. 27: Discussion of your source with your group. Paragraphing.
HW: Finalize Presentation for in-class delivery
Mar. 1: AWA-5 In-class presentations.
AWA-6 Reflection on in-class exercise. Write a brief paragraph (you’re welcome to use the They Say/I Say template or any other format that might be helpful) to respond to the ideas presented in class. Which ones best represent your own? Do they give a beginning sense as to how you might respond to the prompt?
Mar. 3: Introductions and Conclusions
HW: Read “Happiness and Immorality” (on Blackboard), taking careful notes. Identify a contemporary example that sheds light on the assignment question.
Mar. 6: Free writing and discussion of contemporary examples.
HW: craft a tentative thesis for this assignment.
Mar. 8: (Re)Orientation to library research
AWA-7: Define happiness in a well-conceived paragraph, using the assistance of your outside research. Continue outside research and note-taking. Revise your thesis for in-class review.
Mar. 10: Discussion of assignment. Critique of sample writing, including peer review of thesis statements.
[Mar. 20: Class canceled for conferences]
Mar. 22: Peer review in small groups
Mar. 24: Peer Review continued
Mar. 27: WP-3 due!